ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Analysis of flavor characteristics of peanut porridge using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry combined with intelligent sensory technology.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the differences in flavor compounds between aged and fresh peanuts and their effects on peanut porridge aroma, taste, and volatile fingerprint profiles. Methods: Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), combined with electronic sensory technologies such as electronic tongue and electronic nose, was applied to analyze peanut porridge processed under different treatments. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to identify characteristic volatiles and discriminate treatments. Results: Electronic tongue and electronic nose analyses effectively distinguished peanut porridges based on flavor characteristics. A total of 47 volatile compounds were detected, including 10 alcohols, 10 esters, 6 ketones, 5 acids, 2 alkenes, 6 aldehydes, and 8 other compounds. PLS-DA identified 16 characteristic volatiles (VIP > 1), such as 2-pentanone, ethyl hexanoate, 2-acetylfuran, butanal, pentyl acetate, and heptanal. PCA showed that two principal components accounted for 66.7% of the total variance, enabling clear discrimination among treatments. Discussion: The study systematically explored key differences in volatile compounds between aged and fresh peanuts and analyzed their impact on sensory attributes, particularly aroma and flavor perception. These findings enhance understanding of flavor formation mechanisms in peanut-based products and provide scientific evidence for flavor modulation, formulation optimization, product innovation, and quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.