ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Development of a Novel Frailty Trigger for Use at Triage in the Emergency Department.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital solutions in acute medicine: Will electronic health records join up the patient journey (soon?).Future healthcare journal · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Frailty Trigger for Use at Triage in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Department (ED) Triage identifies patients with urgent needs. Frailty is not routinely identified and older patients presenting atypically may be inappropriately triaged as low priority. The introduction of a frailty modifier at triage is recommended in international guidelines, but is not yet widely-adopted.
methodsA Frailty Trigger was developed following a systematic review and two-round eDelphi. To investigate diagnostic test accuracy for frailty, we recruited consecutive adults aged ≥ 70 attending a university hospital ED between December 2021 and February 2022, comparing the Trigger to the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Variable indicative of Placement (VIP), and PRISMA-7. An independent comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) determined frailty status.
resultsIn total, 313 adults aged ≥ 70 years were available, median age 78 ± 9 years and 46% were female. Half (51%) were frail based on the CGA. The Frailty Trigger had excellent diagnostic accuracy for frailty, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.822, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.780-0.865, similar to the VIP (AUC 0.820, p = 0.937), although significantly lower than the PRISMA-7 (AUC 0.896) and CFS (AUC 0.946). Mean administrative time was 25.5 s (SD ±10.9 s). Scoring positive on the Frailty Trigger was associated with increased length of stay (LOS), median 6.4 versus 2.3 days (p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and co-morbidity, a positive score was associated with reduced survival at 1 year (Hazard Ratio 2.2; 95% CI 1.15-4.33, p = 0.017).
conclusionWhen applied as part of ED triage, the Frailty Trigger showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for frailty when compared to validated screens and was quick to use. It predicted LOS and mortality. Studies are required to examine feasibility and its effect on frailty pathways from triage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.