Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103097›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025

Muscle Injuries in 90 Professional Football Players Over 10 Consecutive Seasons: A Comparison of Two Classification Systems and Their Association With Return-to-Play Time.

Pauline J Huber, Björn Schönnagel, Dimitris Dalos, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Gerhard Adam, Götz H Welsch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pauline J HuberDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany.
Björn SchönnagelCentre for Radiology and Endoscopy and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dimitris DalosDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz FroschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany.
Gerhard AdamCentre for Radiology and Endoscopy and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Götz H WelschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0757-9233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC) and the Munich consensus statement (MCS) are both commonly used classification systems and have been established in recent years to categorize muscle injuries and estimate return-to-play time (RTP). While the MCS classifies injuries based on clinical and radiological assessment, the BAMIC primarily relies on radiological imaging but also takes tendon involvement into account. However, there is no consensus on which classification is better suited for the assessment of acute muscle injury and its association with RTP. The aim of this study was to compare BAMIC and MCS in acute muscle injury of professional football players regarding RTP and to identify other player characteristics that influence the layoff time, given the fact that background approaches differ. In 90 professional football players, 169 MRI scans (3 Tesla) of acute muscle injuries were performed on average within 2.3 days of injury and assessed using the BAMIC and MCS. Grading of both classification systems was compared and correlated with RTP. Further player information, like recurrence of injury, dominant leg, affected side, age, or seasonal distribution, was evaluated. The grading of both classification systems correlated with RTP (BAMIC: r = 0.533, p < 0.001; MCS: r = 0.583, p < 0.001). Intratendinous injuries showed significantly longer layoff times (mean = 38.61 days, median = 26.5; range = 3-181; IQR = 25.3; CI = 20.2-38.5) compared to myofascial (mean = 14.17, median = 26.5; range = 3-181; IQR = 25.3; CI = 20.2-38.5) (p < 0.001) and myotendinous lesions (mean = 17.99, median = 26.5; range = 3-181; IQR = 25.3; CI = 20.2-38.5) (p = 0.002). The months of September (n = 22, 13.0%) and April (n = 20, 11.8%) showed significantly higher numbers of muscular injuries (p < 0.001). No association between the dominant side and affected side could be found (p = 0.476). Both classification systems provided a similar association with estimated RTP. The consideration of tendon injuries as classified in the BAMIC proves to be particularly important, as extended RTP can be expected. Still, usage might remain an individual choice. More emphasis should be placed on regeneration and prevention at the beginning and the end of the season to reduce the high incidences.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesMuscle, SkeletalReturn to SportSoccerAdultHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTime FactorsYoung AdultfootballMRImuscle damage/injurymuscle injury classificationprofessional footballreturn‐to‐play time

Identifiers

PMID41103097
PMCPMC12531594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.