Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Andreas SchindlbacherDepartment of Forest Ecology and Soils, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape-BFW, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-4924
Steve Kwatcho KengdoDepartment of Soil Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (Bayceer), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-034X
Jakob HeinzleDepartment of Forest Ecology and Soils, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape-BFW, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0144-4829
Ye TianDivision of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-1158
Mathias MayerInstitute of Forest Ecology, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4366-9188
Josef GadermaierInstitute of Forest Ecology, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9690-085X
Chupei ShiDivision of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-6335
Caro Urbina MaloDivision of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1014-4385
Xiaofei LiuDivision of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9084-2943
Erich InselsbacherInstitute of Soil Research, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5490-8768
Robert JandlDepartment of Forest Ecology and Soils, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape-BFW, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-2634
Carlos A SierraDepartment of Biogeochemical Processes, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0009-4169
Wolfgang WanekDivision of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-8258
Werner BorkenDepartment of Soil Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (Bayceer), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-5757
Funding
Austrian Science Fund I-3745Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 397643203(BO1741/13-1)
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The response of the carbon cycle in forests to global warming could lead to a positive climate feedback if warming accelerates the mineralization of soil organic carbon (SOC), thereby causing net emissions of CO
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Increased Belowground Carbon Allocation Reduces Soil Carbon Losses Under Long-Term Warming. · full record | OpenQuestion