ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
A digital adaptation of the WHO's Self-Help Plus psychological intervention to alleviate stress among community health workers: a mixed-methods evaluation of the SAMBHAV program in rural India.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychological distress and risk of burnout among community health workers (CHWs) in low- and middle-income countries represent a serious global public health concern and threat to efficient health system functioning and resilience. This mixed methods study aimed to test the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a digital adaptation of the WHO's evidence-based Self-Help Plus (SH+) psychological intervention among CHWs, called Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), in rural India. A total of 40 ASHAs, all women, were recruited from Sehore district, Madhya Pradesh, from October 2022 to March 2023. The intervention, a culturally adapted, digitized version of the WHO's evidence-based SH+ intervention, called SAMBHAV, was delivered via smartphone app. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler-10 at baseline, 6- and 12-week follow up. The System Usability Scale and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 were used to assess usability and satisfaction with the digital intervention, respectively. Focus group discussions were used to assess acceptability. From baseline to 12-week follow-up, psychological distress levels significantly reduced (mean decrease of 2.5 points, P = .043), indicating improved psychological health and psychological distress management capacity. The intervention demonstrated favorable acceptability (mean = 20.45) and usability (mean = 69.31), though challenges related to user interface and app navigation were identified. Qualitative feedback supported these findings, with ASHAs describing the intervention as practical, easy to learn, and effective in reducing their psychological distress while empowering them to assist others in managing tension. These findings highlight that the WHO's SH+ intervention can be adapted for different low resource contexts and tailored to meet the needs of specific target groups, specifically for alleviating psychological distress among frontline CHWs. Future research is needed to determine the benefits of scalable brief digital self-help interventions in promoting the well-being of frontline health workers and its resulting impacts on service delivery and health system functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.