Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102954›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

ImageJ Analysis for Transabdominal Endometrial Sonography of Single Saudi Females: A Cohort Study.

Mahasin G Hassan, Huda Alnafa, Nourah Alsofyan, Reham Alsulimi, Sumayah Alsllal, Noura Abaalkhail, Mona Alzurayr, Hessah Alamr, Tasneem Sa Elmahdi, Asma Aldahes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mahasin G HassanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-8915
Huda AlnafaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nourah AlsofyanDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reham AlsulimiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sumayah AlsllalDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noura AbaalkhailDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mona AlzurayrDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hessah AlamrDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tasneem Sa ElmahdiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiologic Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Al-Madinah Al-Munawara, Saudi Arabia.
Asma AldahesDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mayson WanasiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Al-Ghad International Colleges for Applied Sciences, Madina, Saudi Arabia.
Halima HawesaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGynecological assessment of single females in some countries, where transvaginal ultrasound can not be performed, presents a challenge. This study proposed using computer-assisted analysis (ImageJ software) to assess its feasibility for endometrial analysis and consequently enhance the diagnostic value of transabdominal ultrasound. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis pilot normative cohort study was conducted among 20 single healthy volunteers recruited at Princess Nourah University (PNU) ultrasound lab from November 2022 to April 2023. Participants were followed throughout their entire menstrual cycle and underwent a transabdominal ultrasound in the 4 menstrual phases. Sonographs were analyzed using the ImageJ program, and the data were analyzed with SPSS software.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 21 years (± 0.9), and the average menstrual cycle length was 29.65 days (±2.18). The endometrium measured 0.33 cm (±0.137), 0.63 cm (±0.172), 0.89 cm (±0.167), and 1.06 cm (±0.19) in the menstrual, early proliferative, late proliferative, and secretory phases, respectively. At the same time, the intensity score was 96.735 (±26.24), 117.4 (±27.8), 145.37 (±30.0137), and 157.3 (±21.3) in these phases. Endometrial thickness also showed a moderate positive correlation with the intensity score (r=0.545, p=0.000). DISCUSSION: These findings, which demonstrate a correlation between the intensity score and endometrial thickness, underscore the importance of this study in providing a basis for using ImageJ software to analyze transabdominal ultrasound.

conclusionThis pilot study generated preliminary reference values for endometrial thickness and intensity score using transabdominal ultrasound. It also demonstrated a correlation between these measurements, underscoring the potential utility of ImageJ analysis.

Indexed as

AnalysisEndometriumFemale.HistogramImageJTransabdominal sonography

Identifiers

PMID41102954
PMCPMC13130074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.