ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026
Socio-Economic Determinants and Regional Prevalence of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in the Netherlands: Results From the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom Profiles Compatible With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in Individuals With Coeliac Disease on a Long-Term Gluten-Free Diet.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Socio-Economic Determinants and Regional Prevalence of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction in the Netherlands: Results From the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) impose significant burdens worldwide, yet reliable regional prevalence estimates are lacking, limiting insight into potential geographic variation. Socio-economic status (SES) may contribute but remains underexplored.
methodsData were obtained from the Dutch cohort of the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study, including the Rome IV Adult Diagnostic Questionnaire, sociodemographic items, and SES indicators. The Netherlands was divided into three regions (Region 1: South; Region 2: West; Region 3: North-East). Regional prevalence was calculated for any DGBI, groups, and subtypes. Associations with SES were examined using logistic regression. KEY
results2008 participants (50% female; age: 48 years [IQR: 31]; BMI: 25.25 kg/m CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: DGBI affect nearly one-third of adults in the Netherlands, with no regional variation in prevalence. Putative risk factors include limited/no healthcare access and unemployment, supporting consideration of socioeconomic determinants in DGBI care, although further research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.