Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102861›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2025

Throwing like a girl: a critique of past approaches and an illustrated proposal for a path forward.

Anne Fausto-Sterling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anne Fausto-SterlingDepartment of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry. Providence, Brown University, Rhode Island, 02912, USA. afs@brown.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phrase "Throwing like a girl" persists in popular culture and in scientific research as a trope about biological differences between males and females. In this review/theoretical paper I critically examine the support for the idea that sex differences in throwing style and force result from innate biological difference.

methodsThis article contains (1) a limited critical review of selected literature, (2) the application of a systems approach to the development of ball play that starts the study of throwing capacity as it develops in infancy and considers its emergence going forward and (3) a demonstration of this approach using qualitative descriptions of events (at ages 9-15 months) involving toddlers' first engagements in ball play.

resultsThe literature cited to support the claim that sex differences in throwing are a ubiquitous/universal feature of human children is weak. When I compared two toddlers over several months, starting at the time of their first ball throwing game, I learned that the boy and his mother played frequently even before he could walk. In contrast, the girl began ball play at an older age that coincided with her learning to walk. For 8 additional children, the boys started playing ball almost 2.5 months earlier than the girls, and all before they could walk.

conclusionsThe boy could raise the ball higher and throw it further at 13-14 months because he had practiced more from the more stable sitting and kneeling positions which allowed him to master double-handed overhead ball throwing before he could walk. The girl tried throwing the ball while walking unsteadily. Thus, when trying to raise the ball above her head, she often fell, and could not throw it very far. I conclude that to understand sex differences in embodied motor skills in children requires that we study the processes of motor learning beginning at birth.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentPlay and PlaythingsSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfantMaleDevelopmental dynamicsDevelopmental phenomenologyDevelopmental processGender/sexInfant motor developmentPhenomenologyThrowing like a girl

Identifiers

PMID41102861
PMCPMC12532886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.