ReviewImplementation science communications2025
Implementability of clinical practice guidelines: the review and development of a Comprehensive Framework for Guideline Implementability (CFGI).
Review in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a clinical practice guidelines implementability assessment tool (CPG-IAT) based on the COSMIN framework.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe define clinical practice guideline (CPGs) implementability as the characteristics of the guideline that reflect the extent to which it is likely to be adopted in clinical practice. Our objectives were to create a comprehensive and evidence-informed framework of guideline implementability (CFGI).
methodsA mixed-methods approach was used. Based on a systematic literature review of six databases as the foundation, the initial version of the CFGI was created, followed by external consultations to gather feedback and natural language processing tool-assisted classification to refine the framework. To get external validation of the CFGI from expert feedback at an international conference.
resultsFifteen studies related to guideline implementability were identified from the systematic Literature review. The first version of CFGI was compiled, including 6 domains. Feedback on the first version was received from 16 stakeholders, including clinicians, nurses, medical managers, and guideline methodologists, combined with natural language processing tool-assisted classification. The final version of the CFGI is comprised of 6 core domains, containing 21 constructs: (1) Scope and purpose; (2) Clarity and consistency of recommendations; (3) Development and evidence base; (4) Structure and Contents; (5) Development team and transparency; and (6) Implementation environment and tools. Twenty-nine experts participated in the external validation, and the results showed that CFGI had good rationality, importance, clarity, feasibility, and necessity.
conclusionsThe development of the CFGI provides a systematic theoretical basis for the development and implementation of future CPGs, which will help to enhance the implementability of guidelines and facilitate their promotion and application in different medical settings. Future research can further validate and apply the CFGI, explore its effectiveness and feasibility in actual operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.