ReviewJournal of medical case reports2025
Hemifacial spasms caused by compression of the labyrinthine artery on the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
aimHemifacial spasm caused by compression of the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal is very rare, as only 10 preoperative cases have been confirmed. Hemifacial spasm caused by compression of the labyrinthine artery on the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal is exceptionally rare; no other cases have been reported. This is the first report of such a case, offering new understanding of the causes of hemifacial spasm and new guidance for the surgical treatment of refractory hemifacial spasm. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 49-year-old Han female with hemifacial spasm who experienced involuntary twitching of the right facial area for more than 8 years. A facial nerve magnetic resonance imaging scan suggested that the root of the right facial nerve was close to the anterior inferior cerebellar artery. The patient underwent microvascular decompression at our hospital on 10 July 2024. During the operation, the root exit zone of the right facial nerve was explored first, and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery was cushioned with Teflon. Electrophysiological monitoring revealed that abnormal muscle response did not disappear. The cisternal portion of the facial nerve was explored more fully, and the labyrinthine artery was found to be in close proximity to it. Teflon was used as a cushion between the facial nerve and the labyrinthine artery, but the abnormal muscle response did not subside. Finally, it was discovered that the labyrinthine artery and its branches were compressing the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal. After the labyrinthine artery and its branches were separated from the facial nerve with Teflon, the abnormal muscle response disappeared completely. After surgery, the patient's facial twitching fully resolved, and no obvious complications, such as hearing loss or facial paralysis, were observed. Follow-up observation after 8 months revealed no recurrence of facial twitching.
conclusionTo our knowledge, no other cases of hemifacial spasm involving compression of the labyrinthine artery on the facial nerve in the internal auditory canal have been reported in literature. Neurosurgeons should understand from this rare case that not all hemifacial spasms are caused by compression of the root exit zone of the facial nerve, and that compression of the facial nerve of the cisternal portion segment and even in the internal auditory canal cannot be ignored. These conditions must be distinguished through neuroelectrophysiological monitoring. If abnormal muscle response does not completely disappear after decompression of the root exit zone of the facial nerve, the facial nerve needs to be examined throughout the whole intracranial segment, including the root exit zone, the cisternal portion, and the internal auditory canal. All vessels in contact with the facial nerve should be separated until abnormal muscle response is eliminated completely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.