ArticleBMC psychology2025
The effect of eco-anxiety on pro-environmental behaviors and mental well-being: a parallel mediation model.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Health - One Planet - One Mind: integrating eco-anxiety into the One Health paradigm.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Determinants of Recycling Behavior in Emerging Waste Management Systems: The Role of Environmental Concern, Knowledge, Moral Norms, and Attitude.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the links: environmental identity, nature connectedness, eco-anxiety and psychological well-being after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Eco-Anxiety Profiles, Religiosity, and Sustainable Nutrition in Turkish Adults: A Latent Profile and Network Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Eco-anxiety's dual role in adherence to the Mediterranean and DASH diets: the mediating roles of depression, anxiety, and stress.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study focuses on the concept of eco-anxiety and examines its effect on mental well-being through pro-environmental behaviors. In this context, green buying, recycling, and low-carbon behaviors were specifically chosen as pro-environmental actions because they represent the most common everyday practices individuals adopt to reduce environmental impact. Previous research has generally examined pro-environmental actions separately; however, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated these behaviors together or simultaneously tested their parallel mediating roles. By addressing this gap, the present study aims to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the relationship between eco-anxiety and mental well-being.
methodsThe research was conducted using data collected through convenience sampling from 401 participants in a province in Turkey (51.1% female, 48.9% male; Generation X = 9.5%, Y = 49.4%, Z = 41.1%). While this approach ensured adequate sample size, it limits the generalizability of the findings. Data analyses were carried out using SPSS, AMOS, and the PROCESS macro software.
resultsThe findings indicate that eco-anxiety had a significant negative effect on mental well-being, while it had significant positive effects on green buying behavior, recycling behavior, and low-carbon behavior. Furthermore, pro-environmental behaviors were found to have a significant positive effect on mental well-being. Finally, the analysis revealed that pro-environmental behaviors served as parallel mediators in the relationship between eco-anxiety and mental well-being.
conclusionsThese results suggest that, although eco-anxiety is typically seen as a negative emotional response, it may also motivate positive pro-environmental behaviors, which in turn contribute to improved mental well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.