ArticlePlant methods2025
Large-scale non-destructive crown-level assessment of Ginkgo pigments via hyperspectral and machine learning techniques.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The photosynthetic pigments - chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), and carotenoids (Car) - in juvenile ginkgo leaves are crucial for growth monitoring as they reflect physiological status and directly influence the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds such as flavonoids and terpene lactones. Traditional pigment measurement methods (acetone/ethanol extraction, SPAD, etc.) are inadequate for large-scale dynamic monitoring and high-throughput phenotyping analysis. To address this, this study developed a non-destructive prediction model for Chl a, Chl b, and Car contents in ginkgo seedlings using hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning algorithms, which is applicable to seedlings with different genetic backgrounds and at various color development phases. A total of 3,460 seedlings from 590 families, sourced from ancient trees across 19 provinces in China, were analyzed using hyperspectral imaging and biochemical pigment quantification. A phased optimization strategy was implemented, including preprocessing method screening, model comparison, and feature wavelength selection. Among the four tested preprocessing methods (raw reflectance, normalization, first derivative, and second derivative), normalization significantly improved model accuracy. The Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm outperformed partial least squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF), achieving coefficients of determination (R²) above 0.83 and the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) values exceeding 2.4 across all pigments. Compared with competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS), the successive projections algorithm (SPA) demonstrated more effective spectral dimensionality reduction while preserving predictive power. This framework enables efficient, accurate, and scalable pigment phenotyping in Ginkgo biloba, offering technical support for large-scale germplasm screening and precision breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.