ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Long-term anorectal function in rectal cancer patients managed by a watch-and-wait strategy after total neoadjuvant treatment: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Anorectal functional disorders following organ-preserving treatment and resection of rectal cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Is surgery necessary for mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy? A retrospective cohort study with literature context.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the long-term anorectal function and rectal toxicity in rectal cancer patients who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) and were managed with a watch-and-wait (W&W) approach. While oncological outcomes have been favorable, functional outcomes warrant further investigation. Additionally, this research identifies clinical risk factors of anorectal dysfunction post-treatment.
methodsThis was a single-center, cross-sectional study. Rectal cancer patients who underwent TNT followed by W&W between December 2014 and November 2020 were recruited. A minimum 2-year follow-up with no disease progression was required. The study took the form of semi-structured interviews. Multiple scales for evaluation were used, including the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) scale, the Late Effects of Normal Tissues/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) system, the Wexner score, the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument (MSKCC BFI). Univariate analysis and multi-factor Logistic regression were used to identify the risk factors for anorectal dysfunction.
resultsOut of 70 patients with a median follow-up of 43 months, less than half experienced grade I (28/70, 40.0%) or II (1/70, 1.4%) late rectal toxicity according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria, with no cases of more severe toxicity. The prevalence of fecal urgency was the most significant symptom reported (42/70, 60.0%). The median LARS score was 16 [interquartile ranges (IQR) 4-25]; 17.1% (12/70) of patients had minor LARS and 15.7% (11/70) had major LARS. The median Wexner score was 2 (IQR 0-3). The median MSKCC BFI total score was 82.5 (IQR 77-86). Smoking history was an independent risk factor for long-term anorectal dysfunction [odds ratio (OR) 6.562, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.561-27.590].
conclusionMost rectal cancer patients under a W&W strategy after TNT sustain acceptable anorectal function, though fecal urgency remains a common issue. Smoking history emerged as a significant risk factor for anorectal dysfunction. Larger prospective studies focusing on bowel function are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.