Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102780›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment of the web-based MiLES intervention targeted at employers, to enhance successful return to work of employees with cancer: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Judith M Mollet, Michiel A Greidanus, Cécile R L Boot, Christiaan Vis, Johanna M van Dongen, Angela G E M de Boer, Sietske J Tamminga

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06672887 (Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Return on Investment of the Web-based MiLES Intervention Targeted at Employers, to Enhance Successful Return to Work of Employees With Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06672887 phase2 / phase3recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Return on Investment of the Web-based MiLES Intervention Targeted at Employers, to Enhance Successful Return to Work of Employees With Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsCancer, NeoplasmArmsMiLES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Judith M MolletAmsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. j.m.mollet@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2381-4310
Michiel A GreidanusAmsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Cécile R L BootAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation and Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christiaan VisAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Mental Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela G E M de BoerAmsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Sietske J TammingaAmsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 2022-1 DEV / 14333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe MiLES intervention is a digital employer-based tool aimed at enhancing return to work (RTW) of employees with cancer through interactive videos, conversation checklists and tips and information. In a previous study, the MiLES intervention proved to be a useful intervention that aligns with employers' daily practice. The hypothesis is that the MiLES intervention will enhance the employers' willingness, ability and self-efficacy in providing RTW support, which in turn will enhance the RTW of employees with cancer. This paper describes the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), aimed at evaluating the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and return on investment of the MiLES intervention. Parallel to the RCT, a process evaluation of the delivery of the MiLES intervention in a real-world setting will be conducted.

methodsAn RCT with a 12-month follow-up period will be conducted involving 140 employer-employee dyads. The employees are diagnosed with cancer (< 2 years earlier), aged 18-67 years, in paid employment with an employer, and currently fully or partly sick-listed (< 2 years). The employer provides RTW support to the included employee. All dyads will either be allocated to the intervention group, of which the employer will get access to the MiLES intervention, or to the control group in which care as usual will be provided. The primary outcome will be successful RTW (encompassing the employee's perspectives on RTW) at the level of the employee; secondary outcomes will include the following: time to RTW, quality of life and quality of working life, received work-related support, and satisfaction with work-related support. At the level of the employer, the secondary outcomes will include the following: self-efficacy in providing RTW support and satisfaction with the RTW process. All outcomes will be assessed using questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Both the cost-effectiveness and the return on investment analysis will be conducted from the employers perspective. For the process evaluation, the UK MRC framework will be used. DISCUSSION: This RCT will study the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and return on investment of the MiLES intervention. This knowledge is needed to formulate recommendations regarding the implementation of the MiLES intervention beyond the research setting.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06672887. Registered on October 25, 2024.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionNeoplasmsReturn to WorkAdolescentAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSelf EfficacyCancer survivorsEmployeeEmployerInterventionManagerNeoplasmRandomized controlled trial protocolReturn to work

Identifiers

PMID41102780
PMCPMC12532865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.