Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102773›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Gastrointestinal apicomplexan parasites of captive reptiles: diversity, causes, consequences.

Jakub Žahourek, Jana Kvičerová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub ŽahourekDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
Jana KvičerováDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic. kvicej00@prf.jcu.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaptive reptiles frequently suffer from gastrointestinal parasites, which stem from their breeding conditions such as limited space and frequent contact with faeces, high numbers of individuals in inadequate conditions, stress, but also from extensive exports and imports in recent years. In particular, parasites with single-host life cycles are common as they can easily complete their development. This study focused on extensive sampling across a variety of captive reptiles groups including lizards (agamas, chameleons, geckos, iguanas, monitors, skinks), snakes, tortoises, and also crocodiles, originating from various resources (pet trades, private breeders, and zoos).

resultsExamination of faecal samples revealed that 17.9% (55/308) of captive reptiles were infected with coccidia, namely Eimeria (7.1%), Choleoeimeria (5.5%), Isospora (3.9%), and Caryospora (0.3%), and that 3.2% (10/308) were infected with Cryptosporidium. These apicomplexans, which have monoxenous life cycles, may easily be maintained in breedings, and commonly transmitted to the breedings of new owners via trades and expos. While Choleoeimeria spp. were most prevalent in snake hosts, Isospora amphiboluri was recorded as the most common parasite of bearded dragons; however, its host specificity was shown to be relatively low, as it was also able to infect veiled chameleons. In addition, other representatives of coccidia, as well as pseudoparasites from prey items, were also recorded. Although the treatment of coccidiosis in reptiles remains debatable, our findings revealed that it was more effective to treat infected animals with anticoccidials than to leave them untreated.

conclusionsThis is a comprehensive study on a variety of genera of gastrointestinal apicomplexan protists in captive reptiles that considers not only their detection and identification based on a robust combination of morphological and molecular data, but also their host specificity, evolutionary relationships, clinical status, and possible pseudoinfections with parasites of prey items that cannot be proven without the use of molecular methods. The study highlights the frequent occurrence and importance of gastrointestinal parasites in the health of captive reptiles, the need for their examination and consideration, and the application of proper management strategies.

Indexed as

ApicomplexaIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticProtozoan Infections, AnimalReptilesAnimalsAnimals, ZooFecesCaptivityCoccidiaCryptosporidiumDiversityExotic petsFaecesHost specificityMorphologyPhylogenyReptiles

Identifiers

PMID41102773
PMCPMC12532844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.