ArticleMovement ecology2025
Habitat conditions during winter explain movement among subpopulations of a declining migratory bird.
Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental drivers of metapopulation dynamics throughout the full annual cycle in a declining Arctic-nesting migratory herbivore.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding animal movement patterns among subpopulations is crucial for identifying spatiotemporal patterns in animal abundance. Quantifying such movement rates enables a better understanding of population dynamics and how animals decide to move between habitats throughout their range. However, detailed assessments of animal movements among subpopulations are often difficult to obtain with typical capture-mark-recapture methods, limiting our ability to incorporate movement information into conservation planning.
methodsWe used six years of high-resolution Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking data in a Bayesian multistate model to quantify habitat drivers of monthly intra- (i.e., from one month to the next within a winter) and inter-winter (i.e., from the last month of one winter to the first month of the following winter) movements among eight different subpopulations of a declining migratory bird, the Greenland white-fronted goose (Anser albifrons flavirostris).
resultsWe found that while Greenland white-fronted geese were highly philopatric to geographically distinct wintering subpopulations, individuals made intra- and inter-winter movements based on locally available foraging habitat. These decisions changed within and among winters; geese were more likely to make intra-winter movements to areas with fewer croplands and boglands, potentially in response to local food depletion, and more likely to make inter-winter movements to areas with more boglands and “greener” grasslands.
conclusionsWe demonstrated a framework for using high-frequency GPS tracking data to discover movement patterns and test hypotheses about environmental drivers of movements, which could be linked with population dynamics and applied to other species of concern for an improved understanding of metapopulations across space and time. Implementing habitat management strategies that optimize foraging conditions throughout winter, including rewetting degraded peatlands to provide bogland food plants, provision of cereal stubbles in early winter and high-quality grasslands throughout winter may help improve conservation outcomes for Greenland white-fronted geese.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.