Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102755›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025

Equitable mosaic: the ideal for medical pluralism.

Lakshmi K Josyula

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lakshmi K JosyulaIndian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India. jklakshmi@iiphh.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary is a reflection, through a health policy and systems lens, on the medically pluralistic workforce, particularly in low- and middle-income countries that have and utilise numerous systems of medicine, indigenous and adopted. It analyses and distinguishes integration and pluralism, and examines the interaction, and the more frequently observed lack thereof, among different systems of medicine. It highlights the implicit and express hierarchies among the different systems of medicine; the epistemic injustices, wrongs, and resultant harms to different systems of medicine, their practitioners, and the populations that could benefit from them; concomitant inequities in the administration and functioning of the workforce; and the gaps in coordination among diverse disciplines in health care. The commentary underscores the imperative for thoughtful and equitable administration of pluralistic health systems, including emic and etic enquiry, sensitisation, and participatory action, to accomplish the diverse goals of health systems, the health workforce, and the population.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41102755
PMCPMC12532894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.