ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Ocular surface and corneal subbasal nerve plexus changes in ocular graft versus host disease patients treated with topical cyclosporine.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect of topical cyclosporine (0.05%) on the ocular surface and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in patients with chronic Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease (oGVHD).
methodsThis prospective study included 24 eyes from 24 patients with chronic oGVHD. All patients were treated twice daily with topical cyclosporine (0.05%). Ophthalmic examinations were performed at baseline and at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of treatment, including the evaluation of corneal fluorescein staining (CFS).The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was administered. Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) (Sirius, CSO, Italy), central corneal epithelial thickness (ET) (AS-OCT, Topcon 3D OCT-1 Maestro, Japan), upper eyelid non-contact meibography (Sirius, CSO, Italy), and in vivo confocal microscopy (ConfoScan4, Nidek, Japan) measurements were performed.A paired t-test was used for comparative analysis.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in CFS, NIBUT, and OSDI scores at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months, as well as in upper eyelid meiboscores at the 3rd and 6th months compared to baseline (p < 0.05).However, no significant changes were found in ET, corneal sub-basal nerve fiber density, nerve fiber count, or fiber tortuosity throughout the study period (p > 0.05).
conclusionsWhile topical cyclosporine significantly improved the ocular surface and symptoms in patients with oGVHD, it did not alter the morphology of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus. Its anti-inflammatory effects were evident at the epithelial level, but the treatment did not appear to affect the subepithelial region in the short term. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impact of topical cyclosporine on corneal innervation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.