Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102746›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Integrative research and innovation strategy for rare diseases. Insights from the 5-year European joint programme on rare diseases, including analysis to inform recommendations for future actions.

María Del Carmen Sánchez-González, Rodrigo Sarmiento-Suárez, Laura Lee Cellai, Clément Moreau, Marcin Bartoszewicz, Piotr Fiedor, Domenica Taruscio, Marta de Santis, Manuel Posada de la Paz, Daria Julkowska and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

María Del Carmen Sánchez-González *Institute for Rare Diseases Research (IIER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain. mcsanchez@isciii.es.
Rodrigo Sarmiento-Suárez *Institute for Rare Diseases Research (IIER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Laura Lee Cellai *Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Clément MoreauInserm, Paris, France.
Marcin BartoszewiczMedical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr FiedorMedical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Domenica TaruscioIstituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Marta de SantisIstituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Manuel Posada de la PazInstitute for Rare Diseases Research (IIER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Daria Julkowska *Inserm, Paris, France.
Claudio Carta *Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy. claudio.carta@iss.it.
Eva Bermejo-Sánchez *Institute for Rare Diseases Research (IIER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

European Commission GA no. 825575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD) was an initiative that sought to integrate different rare disease strategies into a research ecosystem. This paper summarizes the work of the dedicated work package on Integrative Research and Innovation Strategy and outlines recommendations to facilitate alignment with National Plans and Strategies for Rare Diseases.

methodsWe carried out three periodic surveys (in 2020, 2021 and 2023) on the status of national plans and strategies (NP/NS) for rare diseases in EJP RD member countries. Using the feedback from the surveys and other sources, we developed an annual mapping of research and innovation needs and their alignment with the EJP RD programme. A review of the findings and progress from these approaches - including two strategic policy workshops and the development of National Mirror Groups - informed the recommendations to bridge the gap between national efforts and European strategies.

resultsA total of 34 countries responded to at least one survey. Implementation is uneven: 76% of countries have had their NP/NS approved at some point, but renewals are irregular. For EU13 countries, the most frequent barrier to developing, improving and translating rare disease (RD) research results was funding. In terms of the Programme's activities covering mapped needs, we achieved global coverage of 65.8%, with greater coverage of needs for both the diagnostic pathway and the treatment pathway (71%). Four National Mirror Groups were developed during the Programme's first 5 years, and a further seven were established by mid-2024.

conclusionsDespite recent progress in establishing a research ecosystem for rare diseases in Europe, several challenges remain and should be addressed. These include availability and accessibility of diagnostics, medicines and medical devices across Europe, inequalities between and within countries, compliance with the FAIR data principles and the lack of a comprehensive policy framework to integrate different rare diseases initiatives. Next actions need to strengthen the coordination and alignment of funding and national policies, innovation in the translation of research results and the reach of a holistic research ecosystem. National Mirror Groups will play an important role in this respect.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth PolicyRare DiseasesEuropeHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesInnovation strategyNational plansRare diseasesResearch ecosystem

Identifiers

PMID41102746
PMCPMC12532414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.