Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102741›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

The I-ACTED study (investigating action civics training through an experimental design): a cluster randomized controlled trial of a school-based action civics education intervention on adolescent wellbeing.

Alison K Cohen, Jason C Fitzgerald, Grisel Trejo, Isabella U Yalif, Paul D Wesson, Mark Wolfson, Parissa J Ballard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04514133 (The I-ACTED Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04514133 nacompletednot on this map

The I-ACTED Study: Testing the Causal Effects of a Civic Engagement Intervention on Health and Wellbeing Among Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2021 to 2025Enrolled1,659ConditionsMental Health Wellness 1, Social Interaction, Health AttitudeArmsParticipating in Action Civics program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison K CohenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. alison.cohen@ucsf.edu.
Jason C FitzgeraldDepartment of Curriculum & Instruction, Monmouth University, New Jersy, USA.
Grisel TrejoDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Isabella U YalifVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Paul D WessonDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark WolfsonDepartment of Social Medicine, Population, & Public Health, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Parissa J BallardDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Evidence for Action program 76972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational studies have found that youth civic engagement is associated with positive mental health, education, and socioeconomic outcomes. However, access to civic opportunities is not evenly distributed. Many classrooms in the United States of America (USA) do not have access to high-quality civics education. Action civics approaches to civic education prepare students for civic engagement by developing the necessary civic skills, knowledge, and character. Through action civics, classes take action on a real-world issue students choose together. Some evidence suggests that action civics may positively affect participants' wellbeing through the feelings of civic connection and empowerment. The aim of this study is to investigate, through a randomized controlled trial, the impact of a school-based action civics education intervention on civic and wellbeing outcomes, and the mechanisms of any impact observed, among middle and high school students in the USA.

methodsThis study uses a cluster-randomized trial with a waitlist-control design. We are randomizing at the school level, implementing the intervention at the teacher/classroom level, and measuring outcomes at the student level. We are recruiting social studies, civics, government, and related subject teachers, across both middle and high schools, from across the USA, leveraging network ties and referrals to invite teachers/schools to participate. We aim to recruit a sample of around 1,500 students. Intervention group teachers will receive action civics curricular resources they can incorporate into their regular teaching, while the control group will not receive the curricular resources until 12 months later and will continue with their teaching as planned. Students will fill out surveys at the beginning and end of the semester, and will be invited to complete a survey six months later. Surveys will assess civic, wellbeing, demographic, and other related variables. DISCUSSION: This study is one of the first randomized controlled trials to assess the impacts of action civics curricular materials on civic and wellbeing outcomes. The study will strengthen our understanding of the impacts of action civics education, with implications for the quality and adoption of civic curricula nationwide.

trial registrationNCT04514133 (date of registration September 25, 2020).

Indexed as

Political ActivismStudentsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSchoolsUnited StatesAction civics educationAdolescentsRandomized controlled trialSchoolsWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41102741
PMCPMC12532423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.