Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102732›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Improving parenting skill through the strong families program in Thailand.

Nida Buawangpong, Aala El-Khani, Apinun Aramrattana, Chalermkwan Chutima, Watjana Arunrangsi, Chiraporn Tantihachai, Chaisiri Angkurawaranon, Amalee McCoy, Kawinthip Rinpon, Nopakoon Nantsupawat and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nida BuawangpongDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Aala El-KhaniPrevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria.
Apinun AramrattanaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chalermkwan ChutimaUpstream Family & Community Learning Center, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Watjana ArunrangsiDrugs and Health Programme, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (ROSEAP), Bangkok, Thailand.
Chiraporn TantihachaiChiang Mai juvenile vocational training center, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chaisiri AngkurawaranonDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Amalee McCoyDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kawinthip RinponGlobal Health and Chronic Conditions Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nopakoon NantsupawatDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Karen PetersPrevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria.
Zin Ko Ko LynnDrugs and Health Programme, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (ROSEAP), Bangkok, Thailand.
Wadih MaaloufPrevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna, Austria.
Wichuda JiraporncharoenDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. wichudaj131@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Strong Families program has been successfully implemented in multiple low- and middle-income countries. However, Thailand has only recently begun exploring the program's potential.

objectivesTo assess the feasibility, indicative effects, and adaptability of the Strong Families program.

methodsThis pilot project was conducted between June and July 2024 in Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai, and Mae Hong Son provinces in Thailand. Project trainers and family caregivers participating in the Strong Families program were recruited. Qualitative data were gathered prospectively through semi-structured interviews guided by the RE-AIM framework for project evaluation. Quantitative data were collected retrospectively, including pre- and post-training assessments using validated tools for the Strong Families program: the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Parent and Family Adjustment Scale (PAFAS), and Child & Youth Resilience Measure-Revised Person Most Knowledgeable version (PMK-CYRM-R). Paired t-tests were conducted to indicate effects.

resultsA total of 10 trainers from 8 sites participated, with a majority being female and a mean age of 35.20 ± 5.78 years. Additionally, 47 participants joined the Strong Families program and completed pre- and post-training assessments, most of whom were female, with a mean age of 39.17 ± 10.71 years. Preliminary findings from the pre- and post-training assessments revealed significant improvements in family dynamics and child resilience. Most trainers who participated in the Train-the-Trainer (ToT) program found the Strong Families program easy to implement in their areas by following the guidelines provided. Trainers reported that the program enhanced family relationships and improved mutual understanding among family members. However, challenges were identified, including language barriers and age group differences among participants. Some trainers noted that certain sentences in the materials were difficult to understand and translating them into local languages posed additional challenges. Furthermore, older children completed activities more quickly and experienced more boredom compared to younger children, leading to reduced cooperation. The words/activity adjustments were made to align behavior with cultural norms of the community, such as a pat on the shoulder instead of hugging. Each area plans to expand family and trainer networks, focusing on developing local volunteer trainers to ensure sustainability and continuity. Trainers need ongoing support and feedback from instructors to increase confidence, improve skills, and adapt effectively, especially when working with vulnerable families.

conclusionThe pilot project demonstrated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of the Strong Families program. It holds significant potential for scalability and expansion to other areas in the future. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Family healthParenting skillsPositive parentingProgram evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41102732
PMCPMC12532821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.