ArticleBMC medical education2025
Improving dental students' dexterity and strength: an intervention study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of a Dental Technology Curriculum and a Preventive-Clinical Curriculum on the Development of Preclinical Preparation Skills.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Manual dexterity and self-perceived skill as predictors of performance in dental skills assessments: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental students require manual dexterity, strength, and sensitivity to execute clinical procedures accurately. However, these skills are often not assessed during the university admission process, despite their relevance for academic and professional performance. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether a specific home training program improves manual dexterity, strength, and tactile sensitivity in first-year dental students.
methodsA pre-post intervention study without a control group was carried out with 42 first-year dental students from a Spanish university. Participants followed a home-based programme guided by occupational therapists for eight weeks. Manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test and Box and Block Test), grip strength (dynamometry with JAMAR), and tactile sensitivity (two-point discrimination test) were assessed before and after the intervention. Non-parametric statistical tests were applied, and effect sizes were calculated.
resultsStatistically significant improvements in tactile sensitivity (r >.29, p < .01) and manual dexterity (r >.26, p < .05) in both hands were observed after the intervention. In contrast, grip strength decreased significantly (r >0.35; p < .01). Negative associations were identified between increased sensitivity in the ring and little fingers and reduced strength in both hands. Correlations were also found between improved dexterity and decreased sensitivity in certain fingers of the non-dominant hand. About sex, women showed a greater improvement in sensitivity, although without reaching statistical significance.
conclusionsA structured home programme significantly improves manual dexterity and sensitivity in dental students, even without expensive equipment, demonstrating that these skills can be effectively trained. However, the decrease in grip strength suggests the desirability of incorporating strengthening exercises in future programmes. It is recommended to include control groups and expand the sample size to confirm these findings and optimise preclinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.