ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A practical approach to measuring MPDSR implementation: findings from a cross-sectional assessment in regional referral hospitals in Uganda.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUganda adopted maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in 2017 and has put concerted effort into scaling up and using data on MPDSR to avert preventable deaths. However, formal analysis of MPDSR implementation processes among health facilities in Uganda has been limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of MPDSR processes in referral hospitals in Uganda, using a tested measurement approach.
methodsFrom November to December 2022, a cross-sectional study was conducted to assess MPDSR implementation processes in Uganda's referral hospitals. The tool, adapted from previous studies, uses a 30-point scoring guide to measure progress markers across six stages of implementation. Data collectors visited 15 regional and national referral hospitals and conducted interviews with two members of the MPDSR committee per facility. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize scores by construct and total scores for the facilities. A content analysis from open-ended questions provided contextual insights.
resultsThe average score for MPDSR implementation among referral hospitals in the study was 20.2 out of 30 (range 16 - 27) possible points, which falls in a category showing evidence of routine practice and integration. Progress markers which had particularly low scores included: written staff agreements about MPDSR and orientation of new staff to death reviews. No hospital reported having a budget to support death review meetings. Almost all committee members listed specific ways that MPDSR led to positive changes in quality of care.
conclusionThe overall score of 20.2 was somewhat higher when compared to other countries who have applied this measurement approach (in four countries, average 18.98). Only four of the surveyed hospitals demonstrated sustained practice of MPDSR, suggesting that there is still much work to be done to institutionalize MPDSR in Uganda's referral hospitals. Specific action areas can be pinpointed using the findings on progress markers. The scored MPDSR implementation assessment tool was easy to use and well accepted. We recommend annually updating the tool to reflect new directions and developments in MPDSR implementation, and routine use to self- or externally assess hospitals' implementation of MPDSR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.