ArticleBMC medical education2025
A reflective learning conversation debriefing model for interprofessional simulation based education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' and midwives' experiences of supporting parents following perinatal bereavement: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Understanding death wishes in later life: a narrative review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Embedding equitable placement opportunities in undergraduate science degrees.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDebriefing for Interprofessional Education (IPE) using Reflective Learning Conversation (RLC) methods enables learners to reflect on their actions, articulate their decisions, and benefit from peer support and the dynamics of group thinking within a team-based context. This study aims to validate a co-designed Reflective Learning Conversation (RLC) debriefing model for use in interprofessional learning groups that vary in professional seniority and clinical experience within a multicultural educational environment. The validation process focuses on enhancing clinical reasoning, clinical judgment, critical thinking skills, and self-efficacy.
methodsA quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test mixed method. The study sample consisted of a cohort of interprofessional healthcare providers (n = 130) who were taking part in European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Advanced Life Support (ALS) courses incorporating Simulation- Based Education (SBE) conducted at Hamad International Training Center (HITC), with the sample equally split between control and experimental groups. Data was collected through subsequent direct observations, validated questionnaires, and focus groups. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed on the quantitative data, and thematic analysis on the qualitative data.
resultsThe experimental group had a significantly higher level of clinical reasoning, judgment, and critical thinking skills compared to the control group at the beginning, midway, and end of simulation activities using the Clinical Reasoning Evaluation in Simulation Tool (CREST) tool, Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), and Critical Thinking Rubric (CTR). The experimental group scored a significantly higher level of self-efficacy than the control group for the Self-Efficacy questionnaire subscales.
conclusionReflective Learning Conversation (RLC) model was found to be valid for enhancing clinical reasoning, clinical judgment, critical thinking, and self-efficacy among interprofessional healthcare providers attending advanced life support simulation-based courses in multicultural learning environments. However, further research is recommended to explore how clinical experience and professional seniority interact with debriefing approaches to influence these cognitive and affective outcomes in simulation-based education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.