Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102680›Full record

Observational studyBMC nephrology2025

Real-world burden of primary hyperoxaluria with chronic kidney disease in the United States: a retrospective administrative claims analysis.

David S Goldfarb, Frank Modersitzki, Jeffrey R Skaar, Olivia Li, Sandra Salem, Jing Voon Chen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David S GoldfarbNephrology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA. David.Goldfarb@nyulangone.org.
Frank ModersitzkiNephrology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Jeffrey R SkaarTrinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA.
Olivia LiTrinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA.
Sandra SalemNovo Nordisk, Plainsboro, NJ, USA.
Jing Voon ChenTrinity Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary hyperoxaluria (PH) is a family of three rare, autosomal recessive genetic disorders that can result in recurrent kidney stones, progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), and kidney failure. PH prevalence is underestimated due to its varying presentation and lack of awareness; delays in diagnosis can lead to substantial burdens on the healthcare system.

methodsThis retrospective, observational claims analysis evaluated disease burden and cost of care in patients who had PH, PH with CKD, or CKD alone. Data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Fee-for-Service Limited Data Set were assessed during the study period of January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. PH prevalence was calculated based on the sample population within each data source.

resultsThe study sample included 326 patients who had PH; applying projection factors to the US population, an estimated 4500 patients had a diagnosis of PH in 2021. Among these patients, 37% were estimated to have PH with CKD (65% of whom had early CKD, 33% had advanced CKD, and 2% had stage reported as unknown). Patients who had CKD alone (n = 845) were matched with patients who had PH with CKD (n = 169). Patients who had PH with CKD were significantly more burdened with kidney stones (p < 0.01) than patients who had CKD alone. Higher rates of pharmacotherapy and medical treatments were observed in patients who had PH with CKD versus patients who had CKD alone. Median semi-annual total all-cause healthcare costs were greater in patients who had PH with CKD than in patients with CKD alone, regardless of CKD stage ($54,154 in patients who had PH with advanced CKD vs. $35,016 in patients with advanced CKD alone; $9,784 in patients who had PH with early CKD vs. $5,572 in patients with early CKD alone).

conclusionsCKD stage progression among patients who had PH is associated with increasing all-cause costs, suggesting that early diagnosis and treatment of PH to limit the progression to advanced CKD could represent an opportunity to alleviate not only PH symptoms, but also the healthcare cost burden.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHyperoxaluria, PrimaryRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultDisease burdenHealthcare resource utilizationKidney stonesNephrolithiasisUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41102680
PMCPMC12532900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.