ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Genome landscape and genetic architecture of recombination in domestic goats (Capra hircus).
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inferring Domestic Goat Demographic History Through Ancient Genome Imputation.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecombination is a fundamental biological process, both in participating to the creation of viable gametes and as a driver of genetic diversity. Characterising recombination is therefore of strong interest in breeding populations. In this study, we used ~ 50 K genotyped data and pedigree from two French populations (Alpine and Saanen) of domestic goats (Capra hircus) to build sex-specific recombination maps, and to explore the genetic basis of two recombination phenotypes: genome-wide recombination rate (GRR) and intra-chromosomal shuffling.
resultsSex-specific recombination maps showed higher recombination in males than females for both breeds (Alpine autosomal map size = 35.1 M in males and 30.5 M in females; Saanen map size = 34.0 M in males and 29.0 M in females). Heterochiasmy is particularly notable on small chromosomes, and at both ends of the chromosomes. Yet, no difference in shuffling has been found between populations. Genetic parameters on recombination phenotypes could only be estimated in males, due to lack of data in females. Both phenotypes are significantly heritable (h
conclusionsThis study contributes to the understanding of recombination evolution in ruminants, both between breeds and species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.