ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Integrated nomogram for predicting adolescent depression: psychological, familial, and social risk factors.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent depression is a rising public health issue, particularly in China, due to increased social and changing family dynamics. This study aimed to develop a nomogram model that integrates individual traits, family background, and social support factors to improve the early detection and intervention of adolescent depression.
methodsThis study involved 943 adolescents (232 cases and 711 controls). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to select key predictive variables, and a multivariate logistic regression model was constructed. The model’s performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess its discriminatory power, calibration, and clinical utility.
resultsThe nomogram demonstrated high discriminatory capacity with areas under the curve of 0.988 for the training set and 0.987 for the validation set. Independent risk factors included self-harm behavior, poor familial relationships, and reduced sleep quality. The calibration curves showed strong concordance between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, as validated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.671). DCA revealed that the nomogram offered superior net benefits over traditional screening methods, particularly in identifying high-risk individuals when the risk threshold exceeded 20%. DISCUSSION: This study developed a nomogram incorporating key risk factors, with sleep quality and self-harm behavior emerging as strong predictors of depression. Strained family dynamics also contribute to depression risk. The model’s high accuracy makes it a valuable tool for early clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.