Observational studyBMC primary care2025
Availability and readiness of healthcare services at primary healthcare centers during the Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of malaria vaccine acceptability among healthcare providers in conflict-affected Sudan: a cross-sectional analysis.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Emergency Care Competence and Resource Gaps Among Resident Physicians in Selected Syrian Governmental Hospitals: Implications for Health System Recovery.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth services in Sudan have been severely disrupted during the ongoing war, leading to a decline in the availability and readiness of services at the primary care level. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and readiness of healthcare services at Sudanese primary healthcare centers (PHCCs) during the current conflict.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in four out of seven safe states in Sudan. Using the Service Delivery Indicator (SDI) survey, the availability and readiness of 15 medical equipment items, 15 vaccines, and 36 essential drugs were assessed. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare indices across states, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test to identify significant differences. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsAmong the 50 PHCCs included, the mean equipment availability index was 63.6%, while the overall vaccine availability index was 48.0%, with 80% of facilities providing vaccination services. The overall drug availability index was 54.4%, with River Nile State having the highest availability at 67.6%. Vaccine availability indices in Red Sea State (mean = 29%) and River Nile State (mean = 24.4%) were significantly lower than in Gadarif State (mean = 80.7%) (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference in drug availability across the four states (p = 0.015).
conclusionPrimary healthcare centers in Sudan face significant challenges during the war, with shortages in medical equipment, vaccines, and essential drugs. Addressing these gaps is critical to ensure service functionality and prevent disease outbreaks. Strengthening supply chains and prioritizing healthcare support are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.