Observational studyJournal of neurology2025
Five-year prospective outcomes of medical management and microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical predictors of treatment success following Gasserian ganglion conventional radiofrequency in trigeminal neuralgia: secondary cohort analysis.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Early Pain Outcomes After Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Resting-state local brain functional synchronization after a single trigger-zone stimulation: with versus without evoked pain in classical trigeminal neuralgia patients.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia is a severe facial pain disorder with major impact on quality of life. Long-term prospective data comparing medical and surgical treatments remain scarce. This study compared 5-year outcomes of medical management and microvascular decompression (MVD) and explored predictors of treatment response.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational cohort study at a national referral center (2012-2019). Consecutive patients with classical or idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia underwent MRI, baseline assessment, and systematic 5-year follow-up. Treatment allocation (medical therapy or MVD) followed clinical evaluation and international guidelines. The primary outcome was categorized as pain-free without medication, pain-free with medication, continued pain without medication, or continued pain with medication.
resultsOf 626 eligible patients, 227 completed follow-up (95 MVD, 132 medical). Pain-free without medication was achieved in 59% of MVD patients versus 19% of medically treated [relative risk (RR) 3.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67-5.50]. Pain-free with medication occurred in 1% after MVD versus 14% of the medical cohort (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.69). Continued pain on medication was less frequent after MVD (22% vs 49%; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.80). Male sex predicted excellent outcome after MVD (odds ratio 2.60, 95% CI 1.02-6.91). Postoperative hypoesthesia occurred in 23% and hearing impairment in 7%, while 55% of medically treated patients reported side effects.
conclusionsMVD provided superior long-term pain relief, higher rates of medication-free pain freedom, and reduced medication use compared with medical management, supporting earlier surgical consideration in selected patients and emphasizing individualized, guideline-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.