ReviewNature protocols2026
Navigating the data processing for cytometry-based single-cell proteomics.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating the Landscape of Cytometry-Based Single-Cell Proteomics: Quantification, Annotation, and Resources.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytometry-based single-cell proteomics (SCP) has emerged as a powerful technique that greatly advances our understanding of complex biological systems with a new level of granularity. Various methods have been developed to process cytometry-based SCP data. However, it remains extremely challenging to identify the well-performing processing workflows for specific datasets. Here, we develop ANPELA, an out-of-the-box method for navigating the proteomic data processing based on large-scale screening. It enables a comparison among the performances of thousands of the processing workflows in identifying cell subpopulations and inferring pseudo-time trajectories based on machine learning. Several cases are then analyzed, highlighting its ability to identify the optimal ways of data processing for cytometry-based SCP studies. A new package is also deployed to ensure multiscenario usability (such as desktop software, R package and online server), data security (enabling local and open-source execution) and a user-friendly interface (realizing interactive and visualizable applications). Overall, ANPELA can be utilized by a broad audience, including those without coding skills, and is freely accessible and downloadable at https://idrblab.org/anpela/ . Its execution time may range from minutes to hours depending on the size of the analyzed data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102581What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.