ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2026
Astroimmunology: the effects of spaceflight and its associated stressors on the immune system.
Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics Characterization of Human Molecular Responses to Spaceflight Across Two Independent Missions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simulated spaceflight disrupts the immune-gut-brain axis and drives sex-dependent neuroinflammation, axonal injury, and behavioral deficits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The case for space as a model of accelerated aging.Nature aging · 2026Review
- Simulated Microgravity Recapitulates Aspects of Biological Aging in Humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- H-SPAR DB: human spaceflight platform for analysis and research-an integrative omics database for space health.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Parabolic flight induces site specific microbiome changes in women.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As humans embark on longer and deeper missions into space, it is crucial to understand how spaceflight impacts the immune system. Decades of discoveries, bolstered by recent multiomic analyses, have identified key immune processes that are affected by the spaceflight environment. These findings form the foundations of the emerging field of 'astroimmunology'. Spaceflight stressors - such as microgravity and galactic cosmic radiation - and other mission-associated variables, including psychological stress and abnormal circadian rhythms, can disrupt or adversely affect immune cell biology. In addition, spaceflight alters host-microbiome interactions, which can increase susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens and viral reactivation. Although ground-based analogues for human spaceflight have provided insights into these stressors individually, their combined effects during spaceflight remain less understood. This Review explores our current knowledge of the effects of spaceflight stressors on the immune system and the clinical implications for human space exploration. It also highlights current and developing countermeasures, including machine-learning approaches, advanced monitoring technologies and standardized biobanking, that can facilitate research into the impact of spaceflight on the immune system. Looking ahead, progressing from low Earth orbit missions to long-term missions to the Moon, Mars and beyond will introduce new challenges, including increased radiation, variable gravity and regolith exposure. We discuss these prospective challenges and outline potential preventive and mitigative strategies for sustaining immune health to enable safe and effective space exploration and habitation of distant worlds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.