ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
National assessment of early intervention services for children with developmental disorders in Lithuania: A mixed-methods study on gaps and future directions.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The organization of pediatric care: the right care, from the right professional, at the right time and place: an editorial update.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to provide the first comprehensive national assessment of early intervention services for children with developmental disorders in Lithuania. The primary goal was to identify key challenges related to accessibility, quality, diagnostic capabilities, professional training, and family involvement, and to offer evidence-based recommendations for systemic improvement. A multi-method approach was employed, including demographic data analysis, structured surveys of 46 early intervention institutions, 753 specialists, and 1,004 parents, as well as site visits to 11 representative institutions. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and triangulated to assess service coverage, diagnostic practices, training access, and service quality across regions. The findings revealed significant regional disparities in service access, long waiting times, limited availability of validated diagnostic tools, and a shortage of qualified professionals. Only 24% of specialists expressed high satisfaction with available diagnostic and treatment methodologies. Although service coverage has expanded, systemic fragmentation persists. Parents identified gaps in communication, individualization of care, and access to home-based guidance. Institutions prioritized professional training as the top need, followed by updated methodologies and equipment. Conclusion: Despite notable efforts and committed professionals, Lithuania's early intervention system faces systemic barriers that limit its effectiveness. The study highlights the urgent need for national clinical guidelines, validated tools, expanded training opportunities, and greater family engagement. These findings offer a foundation for health policy reforms aimed at building a more accessible, equitable, and family-centred early intervention system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.