ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2025
Second-Line Treatment in cholangiocarcinoma - Current State of the Art and Future Perspectives.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor DNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant cholangiocarcinoma for biomarker-guided therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThe current landscape of second-line treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) appears to be evolving, with emerging strategies offering potential improvements over traditional approaches. Although conventional chemotherapy demonstrates limited efficacy following progression after first-line therapy, the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies is creating new possibilities for enhancing clinical outcomes. The increasing focus on molecular biomarkers-such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), B-raf kinase (BRAF), and neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) mutations, as well as fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) fusions and HER2/neu overexpression-represents a significant advancement in enabling precise, targeted treatment options. Evidence from recently completed and ongoing clinical trials evaluating these therapies, both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, supports this shift. Continued research aimed at refining treatment selection and advancing personalized therapeutic strategies is essential, with the goal of achieving longer survival and improved quality of life for patients undergoing second-line therapy for CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.