ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Clinical Impacts of Immunogenicity in Approved Antibody Drugs in Japan: A Quantitative Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunogenicity, commonly manifested through the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), is a critical concern for therapeutic antibodies as it can adversely affect pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety. Although ADA-related impacts have been closely evaluated for individual antibody drugs, cross-product analyses of approved antibody drugs remain limited. In this study, we examined 92 antibody therapeutics approved by the Japanese regulatory authority as of March 2024, focusing on their review reports and prescribing information, to quantitatively assess the actual clinical impacts of ADA. Among these drugs, ADA-related decreased drug exposure, reduced efficacy, and worsened safety were indicated in the prescribing information of 18.5%, 10.9%, and 5.4%, respectively. Interestingly, ADA-related descriptions of both decreased drug exposure and reduced efficacy were observed in significantly lower proportions among oncology drugs than among non-oncology drugs. Furthermore, humanized antibodies exhibited higher proportions of ADA-related impacts than human antibodies; in particular, decreased exposure was significantly more common with humanized antibodies (27.7%) than with human antibodies (8.6%), supporting the concept that human antibodies have lower immunogenic potential. In addition, our evaluation of review reports indicated that all drugs with ADA-related reduced efficacy had decreased exposure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively evaluate the clinical impact of immunogenicity in approved antibody therapeutics in Japan. These results are expected to inform the appropriate clinical use of antibody therapeutics and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of immunogenicity risk assessments during clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.