Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102540›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2025

Connections on the Line: Interactions Between Care, Expertise, and Anonymity in a Suicide Hotline in Hong Kong.

Nicole Zhong, Zhiying Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole ZhongThe College, The University of Chicago, 5801 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL, USA. elocinzhong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6250-0635
Zhiying MaCrown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, University of Chicago, 969 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide hotlines as a form of teletherapy have been associated since conception with questions of non-consensual reporting and intervention. This article investigates how suicide hotline volunteers in Hong Kong engaged with expertise and anonymity to perform care. The analysis consists mostly of semi-structured interviews with volunteers at a multilingual suicide hotline in Hong Kong. Firstly, we deconstruct expertise in hotline care-volunteers separated enacting expert knowledge from authority to simultaneously respond to cultural nuances in caller expectations toward authority and perform non-interventive care. Secondly, we show how anonymity within hotlines creates obscurations between callers and volunteers that raises the stakes to volunteers' decision-making in care. When volunteers embraced uncertainty and committed to providing confidentiality and control to callers, anonymity facilitated the prioritization of caller choice, even in death. Finally, we reflect on how acts of volunteers recognizing and forming connections with callers can demonstrate how we can meet each other, bridge divides, and connect as strangers in the city.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityHotlinesSuicideSuicide PreventionAdultFemaleHong KongHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAnonymityCareExpertiseStrangersSuicide

Identifiers

PMID41102540
PMCPMC12745309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.