ArticleObesity surgery2025
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of Bariatric Surgery Educational Content on TikTok and Bilibili: a Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality assessment of public education short videos on robot-assisted cholecystectomy and analysis of audience preferences.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- TikTok, Xiaohongshu, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on lung cancer: a multi-platform content evaluation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Assessing the reliability and quality of avascular necrosis of the femoral head content on social media: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Alcohol-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis of Douyin and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of pediatric inguinal hernia treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and content completeness of Chinese-language short videos on impacted wisdom teeth on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Engagement-quality mismatch in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty short videos on TikTok and Bilibili.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional analysis of the quality and reliability of Wilson disease videos on Bilibili, Douyin, and Kuaishou.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Understanding obesity treatment choices: a mixed-methods study of patient preferences and shared decision-making.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- The role of social media in shaping public perceptions of bariatric surgery: a comprehensive analysis of Douyin data.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Health information quality of gallbladder cancer videos on TikTok and Bilibili in China: A cross-sectional content analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a chronic disease with a rising global prevalence, representing a significant public health burden. Patients increasingly utilize short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili to obtain health information regarding bariatric surgery. The quality and reliability of this content have not been thoroughly evaluated, raising concerns about the potential for misinformation to influence patient decision-making.
methodsA cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on the top 100 videos retrieved from both TikTok and Bilibili using the keyword "bariatric surgery" in Chinese. After excluding irrelevant and duplicate content, a total of 200 videos were included for analysis. Videos were systematically categorized by uploader type and content. Two senior bariatric surgeons independently assessed the videos for quality and reliability using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a modified DISCERN instrument.
resultsTikTok videos demonstrated significantly higher user engagement, with greater median likes, collections, shares, and comments compared to Bilibili (p < 0.001). Conversely, Bilibili videos had a significantly longer median duration (p < 0.001). The overall quality of videos on both platforms was suboptimal. However, TikTok videos received modestly higher GQS and DISCERN scores from both reviewers (p < 0.05). Content uploaded by professional institutions achieved the highest quality scores across both platforms (p < 0.001). Professional individuals were the predominant uploaders, accounting for 79.0% of the videos. A strong positive correlation was observed among user engagement metrics (likes, saves, shares, comments; r > 0.9), but these metrics showed no significant correlation with GQS or DISCERN quality scores.
conclusionThe quality and reliability of bariatric surgery-related educational content on both TikTok and Bilibili are largely inadequate. While TikTok videos demonstrated slightly superior quality scores, professional institutions represent the most reliable source of information. User engagement metrics are poor indicators of video quality. These findings underscore the need for healthcare professionals to guide patients in navigating online health information and for platforms to implement more stringent quality control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.