ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
A Machine Learning System to Automate Body Computed Tomography Protocoling.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selection of radiology imaging protocols is a vital step in the radiology workflow as incorrect protocol selection can lead to suboptimal imaging and thereby jeopardize patient health, delay treatments, and/or increase healthcare costs. However, this process is generally thought of as an inefficient use of radiologist's time. We developed a machine learning (ML) system that can predict radiology protocols accurately based on patients' electronic medical record (EMR) data. The system is an ensemble of three decision tree (DT)-based techniques trained to provide protocols for body computed tomography (CT) examinations. The most common 15 CT abdomen protocols were used to tune the models, with the system designed to provide the three most probable predictions for further radiologist revision. Our ensemble classifier, with the F1 score of approximately 83%, outperformed each model with the mean F1 score of approximately 80% in 5-fold cross-validation and performed the best with an F1 score of 95.5% for the top three predictions, surpassing the individual models with F1 scores ranging from 87.6% to 92.9%. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that ML techniques can predict radiology protocols and identify key classification-dependent features. These models could be leveraged for use as a clinical decision support system to improve radiologists' efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41102427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.