ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatial modelling of groundwater potential zones in the Neyyar Basin using machine learning and morphometric analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employs morphometric analysis integrated with machine learning (Random Forest) to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) in the Neyyar Basin. A total of 60 morphometric parameters, categorized under linear, areal, relief, and drainage texture aspects, were extracted using SRTM DEM (30 m resolution) and analyzed to assess their influence on groundwater occurrence. Thematic layers such as geology, geomorphology, drainage density, lineament density, land use/land cover, soil type, slope, curvature, and rainfall were integrated with CGWB well yield and static water level data to train the Random Forest model. The results classified the basin into high (43.27%), moderate (21.78%), and low (34.96%) groundwater potential zones. High potential zones were observed in valleys, lower slopes, and fractured rock regions, where favorable infiltration and storage conditions enhance groundwater availability. Low potential zones were concentrated in steep terrains with high drainage density and low permeability, restricting recharge. The study confirms that morphometric parameters such as drainage density, bifurcation ratio, and relief characteristics are key indicators of groundwater occurrence, influencing infiltration, runoff, and storage capacity. By integrating detailed morphometric analysis with machine learning, this study enhances the accuracy of groundwater potential mapping, offering a robust approach for sustainable water resource management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.