Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102369›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of implicit motor learning across body segments in Parkinson's disease vs. healthy controls.

Matteo Rizzo, Paola Ortelli, Alberto Bottari, Alessandra Scarton, Federica Bombieri, Mirta Fiorio, Luca Sebastianelli, Davide Ferrazzoli, Silvia Pogliaghi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matteo Rizzo *Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paola Ortelli *Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Vipiteno-Sterzing, Italy.
Alberto BottariDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via F. Casorati 43, Verona, 37131, Italy.
Alessandra ScartonDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via F. Casorati 43, Verona, 37131, Italy.
Federica BombieriDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via F. Casorati 43, Verona, 37131, Italy.
Mirta FiorioDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via F. Casorati 43, Verona, 37131, Italy.
Luca SebastianelliDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Vipiteno-Sterzing, Italy.
Davide FerrazzoliDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Vipiteno-Sterzing, Italy.
Silvia PogliaghiDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Via F. Casorati 43, Verona, 37131, Italy. silvia.pogliaghi@univr.it.

Funding

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Ufficio Innovazione e Tecnologia 301/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in motor learning are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Possible body segment-specificity remains unexplored and could have practical implications for testing and rehabilitation. Our aim was to investigate sequence-specific implicit motor learning differences in alternative task movements in people with early stages PD vs. age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Thirty participants with PD (67.6 ± 8.0 yrs, 1.9 ± 0.7 H&Y) and 30 HC (69.6 ± 5.2 yrs) performed three Serial Reaction Time Tasks (SRTTs), which differed for the body segment used to perform it: Hands, Arms, and Feet testing. Visual-motor reaction time was recorded in response to visual stimuli. For each task, eight blocks, each consisting of 4 repetitions of a 12-stimuli sequence, were presented: random sequence order was practiced in block one and eight (R1, R8); a fixed 12-stimuli sequence order was performed in blocks from 2 to 7 (S2-S7). Reaction Times were corrected for errors (RT) and reprocessed as percentage values, where the mean RT of R1 represented 100% (RT

Indexed as

LearningParkinson DiseaseAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeBody districtsImplicit motor learningMovement disordersMovement taskParkinson’s diseaseReaction timesRehabilitationSerial reaction time task

Identifiers

PMID41102369
PMCPMC12532993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.