Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102340›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Computational analysis of L4-L5 interspinous process devices and interbody fusion spacers using ceramic and polymeric materials via finite element modeling and artificial intelligence.

Yomna H Shash, Rana Hossam Elden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yomna H ShashBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt. Yomna.abdelhamid@h-eng.helwan.edu.eg.
Rana Hossam EldenBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis involves pathological narrowing of the spinal canal, whereas disc degeneration refers to the progressive deterioration of intervertebral disc structure and function. Interspinous process devices (ISPs) are commonly used to manage spinal stenosis, whereas anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) spacers are employed for conditions such as spondylolisthesis and disc degeneration. Although titanium remains the standard material for spinal devices, ceramics and polymers have emerged as promising alternatives because of their favorable biomechanical and biological properties. This study investigated the biomechanical performance of ceramic- and polymer-based materials in ALIF and ISP devices via finite element method (FEM) simulations and further explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) models to predict biomechanical responses on the basis of material characteristics. In the first phase, FEM models were used to evaluate spinal devices made of ceramics (zirconia, alumina), ceramic composites (ZTA, ATZ), polymers (PEEK, PEKK, PMMA), fiber-reinforced composites (CFR-PEEK, GFR-PEEK), and hydroxyapatite-reinforced PEEK (HA-PEEK) under physiological loading in both normal and osteoporotic bone conditions. In the second phase, eighteen machine learning regression models were trained on FEM-generated datasets to predict key biomechanical metrics, including stress, strain, and range of motion (ROM). The results demonstrated that for ISP devices, stiffer materials such as ceramics and CFR-PEEK 60% reduced stress and strain in adjacent vertebrae compared with softer polymers, thereby lowering fracture risk. Conversely, for ALIF spacers, more compliant materials, such as PEEK and PEKK, offered better performance in osteoporotic spines because of improved load-sharing capabilities. Among AI models, multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector regression (SVR), and XGBoost achieved high predictive accuracy (R

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCeramicsLumbar VertebraePolymersSpinal FusionBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHumansSpinal StenosisPolymersAluminaAnterior lumbar interbody fusionArtificial intelligenceDisc degenerationInterspinous process devicePEEKSpinal stenosisZirconia

Identifiers

PMID41102340
PMCPMC12533109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.