Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102333›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis of unconventional optical standing wave patterns outside a metal-substrate supported dielectric microsphere.

Arya Kumar Siddharth, Venkata Ramanaiah Dantham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arya Kumar SiddharthDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology , Patna, Bihar, 801103, India.
Venkata Ramanaiah DanthamDepartment of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology , Patna, Bihar, 801103, India. dantham@iitp.ac.in.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board CRG/2021/002951 & EEQ/2023/000876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present a theoretical study on the electric field intensity (EFI) and magnetic field intensity (MFI) distributions outside a single dielectric microsphere placed on a metal substrate. For the first time, intense unconventional optical standing wave patterns (UOSWPs) are observed outside the metal substrate-supported microsphere at the resonant wavelengths or wavelengths of whispering gallery modes (WGMs). However, the conventional and reflective photonic nanojets (PNJs) are observed at the non-resonant wavelengths. The minimum separation between the UOSWPs and the microsphere's surface is found to be sensitive to the microsphere's radius (r). The EFI and MFI distributions are analyzed across different planes for transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarized light to characterize the UOSWPs. Finally, a comparison is made between UOSWPs observed outside a metal-supported microsphere and conventional optical standing wave patterns (COSWPs) or WGMs observed at the interface of a substrate-free dielectric microsphere. In the case of the substrate-free dielectric microsphere, most of the electric and magnetic fields of WGMs exist inside the microsphere, and only the weak field or evanescent of the WGMs is accessible outside the microsphere for practical applications. In contrast to the WGMs, the intense electric and magnetic fields of the UOSWPs exist outside the microsphere and can enhance the light-matter interaction significantly. Hence, we strongly believe that the UOSWPs will have several potential applications in various research domains.

Indexed as

Dielectric microsphereElectric field intensityMagnetic field intensityMetal substratesOptical standing wave patternsPhotonic nanojetsWhispering gallery modes

Identifiers

PMID41102333
PMCPMC12533178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.