ArticleScientific reports2025
Inhibition of the lateral hypothalamus emboldens adult female spiny mice to huddle with an established group of novel peers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals of large group-living species that exhibit dispersal or have overlapping territories with other groups frequently encounter novel conspecifics. To avoid injury, successfully obtain a mate, integrate into a new group, and/or to determine one's social rank, it is crucial to accurately assess social information. The lateral hypothalamus (LH) is critical for learning about food-related cues and shifting behavior toward or away from salient events. While the LH facilitates risk assessment in dyadic social competitions, how the LH modulates social behavior in non-aggressive contexts with novel peers remains unknown. In the highly colonial spiny mouse (Acomys dimidiatus), we used chemogenetics to inhibit the LH of females as they interacted with novel peers in a novel vs. familiar preference test, a group size preference test, and a group interaction test. Although control females were investigative and prosocial (e.g., affiliative proximity), they exhibited significant social avoidance of a novel peer group. However, we found that inhibition of the LH induced a preference for social novelty, decreased social avoidance, and promoted affiliative proximity and huddling with a novel, previously established group of peers. These findings suggest that the LH may function to promote cautious behavior, potentially via risk assessment, in novel social environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.