ArticleScientific reports2025
Using digital archaeology and machine learning to determine sex in finger flutings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the earliest and most enigmatic forms of rock art are finger flutings and previous methods of studying them relied on biometric finger ratios from modern populations to make assumptions about the people who left the flutings, which is theoretically and methodologically problematic. This work is a proof-of-concept for a paradigm shift away from error-prone human measurements and controversial theories to computational digital archaeology methods for an innovative experimental design using a tactile, virtual, and machine learning approach. We propose a digital archaeology experiment using a tactile and virtual approach based on multiple samples from 96 participants. We trained a machine learning model on the known data to determine the sex of the person who made the fluting. While the virtual dataset did not provide sufficiently distinct features for reliable sex classification, the tactile experiment results showed potential for the identification of the sex of fluting artists, but more samples are needed to make any generalization. The significant contribution of this study is the development of a foundational set of methods and materials. We provide a novel digital archaeology approach for data creation, data collection, and analysis that makes the experiment replicable, scalable, and quantifiable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.