Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102331›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using digital archaeology and machine learning to determine sex in finger flutings.

Andrea Jalandoni, Robert Haubt, Calum Farrar, Gervase Tuxworth, Zhongyi Zhang, Keryn Walshe, April Nowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea JalandoniPlace, Evolution, Rock Art Heritage Unit, Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia. a.jalandoni@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-7183
Robert HaubtThe School of Computer Science & Information Technology, SAE University College, Brisbane, Australia.
Calum FarrarPlace, Evolution, Rock Art Heritage Unit, Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Gervase TuxworthSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9278-4695
Zhongyi ZhangSchool of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-9953
Keryn WalsheFaculty of Arts, Anthropology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
April NowellDepartment of Anthropology, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Rd, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1103-2919

Funding

Australian Research Council,Australia DE240100030Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Grant 435-2019-0656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the earliest and most enigmatic forms of rock art are finger flutings and previous methods of studying them relied on biometric finger ratios from modern populations to make assumptions about the people who left the flutings, which is theoretically and methodologically problematic. This work is a proof-of-concept for a paradigm shift away from error-prone human measurements and controversial theories to computational digital archaeology methods for an innovative experimental design using a tactile, virtual, and machine learning approach. We propose a digital archaeology experiment using a tactile and virtual approach based on multiple samples from 96 participants. We trained a machine learning model on the known data to determine the sex of the person who made the fluting. While the virtual dataset did not provide sufficiently distinct features for reliable sex classification, the tactile experiment results showed potential for the identification of the sex of fluting artists, but more samples are needed to make any generalization. The significant contribution of this study is the development of a foundational set of methods and materials. We provide a novel digital archaeology approach for data creation, data collection, and analysis that makes the experiment replicable, scalable, and quantifiable.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyFingersMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleComputational archaeologyDigital tracingExperimental archaeologyRock artVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41102331
PMCPMC12531323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.