Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102329›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

A new biomarker combination differentiates viral from bacterial infections and helps monitoring response to antibiotics in hospitalized children.

Federica Pagano, Stefano Brusa, Giusy Arrichiello, Valentina Cioffi, Marco Poeta, Dario Bruzzese, Giuseppe Portella, Alfredo Guarino, Eugenia Bruzzese

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Circulatory biomarkers for microbial infections.Journal of circulating biomarkers
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federica PaganoPhD National Program in One Health Approaches to Infectious Diseases and Life Science Research, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy. federica.pagano@unina.it.
Stefano BrusaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Virology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giusy ArrichielloDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.
Valentina CioffiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.
Marco PoetaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.
Dario BruzzeseDepartment of Public Health, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe PortellaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Virology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Alfredo GuarinoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.
Eugenia BruzzeseDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy.

Funding

NextGeneration EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases PE00000007, INF-ACT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new diagnostic techniques to support the initial clinical evaluation is one of the key strategies to mitigate the inappropriate antibiotic prescription in Pediatrics. We conducted a prospective observational study to test a novel chemiluminescence assay that helps differentiating bacterial and viral infections by combining three host-response proteins (C-reactive protein, TRAIL and IP-10). We enrolled 255 children (age 1-243 months) presenting to a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit with fever (60%), cough (22.4%), gastrointestinal symptoms (22%), proven infection (38%). The 22.7% of patients carried at least one comorbidity. The baseline test demonstrated 51% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy was better than traditional biomarkers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count). Stratifying the analysis by pre-admission antibiotic treatment, naïve patients showed higher sensitivity for bacterial infection (0.70 vs. 0.15), better negative predictive value (0.60 vs. 0.45) and lower error rate (0.24 vs. 0.51). A significant score reduction was observed shortly after starting antibiotic therapy in a subgroup with microbiologically confirmed bacterial diagnosis (mean - 45.12, mean interval = 4 days). We concluded the test could improve infection management in pediatric settings, support initial therapy decision and potentially reduce unnecessary antibiotics. However, its optimal implementation requires a precise definition of the target population.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersVirus DiseasesAdolescentChildChild, HospitalizedChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinAntimicrobial stewardshipBiomarkersDifferential diagnosisInfectionPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID41102329
PMCPMC12533176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.