Observational studyScientific reports2025
A new biomarker combination differentiates viral from bacterial infections and helps monitoring response to antibiotics in hospitalized children.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Diagnostics for Distinguishing Bacterial and Viral Infections: A Review of Technologies, Clinical Utility, and Stewardship Implications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- A Sensitive Multichannel Fluorescent Polymer Sensor Array for the Detection of Protein Fluctuations in Serum.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Circulatory biomarkers for microbial infections.Journal of circulating biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of new diagnostic techniques to support the initial clinical evaluation is one of the key strategies to mitigate the inappropriate antibiotic prescription in Pediatrics. We conducted a prospective observational study to test a novel chemiluminescence assay that helps differentiating bacterial and viral infections by combining three host-response proteins (C-reactive protein, TRAIL and IP-10). We enrolled 255 children (age 1-243 months) presenting to a Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit with fever (60%), cough (22.4%), gastrointestinal symptoms (22%), proven infection (38%). The 22.7% of patients carried at least one comorbidity. The baseline test demonstrated 51% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The diagnostic accuracy was better than traditional biomarkers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell count). Stratifying the analysis by pre-admission antibiotic treatment, naïve patients showed higher sensitivity for bacterial infection (0.70 vs. 0.15), better negative predictive value (0.60 vs. 0.45) and lower error rate (0.24 vs. 0.51). A significant score reduction was observed shortly after starting antibiotic therapy in a subgroup with microbiologically confirmed bacterial diagnosis (mean - 45.12, mean interval = 4 days). We concluded the test could improve infection management in pediatric settings, support initial therapy decision and potentially reduce unnecessary antibiotics. However, its optimal implementation requires a precise definition of the target population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.