Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing species-specific neonicotinoid toxicity using cross-species chimeric nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in a Drosophila model.

Anna Lassota, James J L Hodge, Matthias Soller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna LassotaSchool of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
James J L HodgeSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Matthias SollerSchool of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. matthias.soller@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N021827/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSRC BB/W000865/1NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels and the main mediators of synaptic neurotransmission in the insect brain. In insects, nAChRs are pivotal for sensory processing, cognition and motor control, and are the primary target of neonicotinoid insecticides. Neonicotinoids are potent neurotoxins, and pollinators such as honey bees are more sensitive and affected by extremely low sub-lethal doses. nAChR subtypes exist as homomers of α-subunits or heteromers composed of α and β subunits. The honey bee nAChRα8 subunit is orthologous to nAChRβ2 in Drosophila, raising the question of whether this α to β change makes flies less sensitive to neonicotinoids. To investigate species-specific aspects of neonicotinoid toxicity, we CRISPR-Cas9 engineered a cross-species chimeric nAChR subunit by swapping the ligand-binding domain in Drosophila of nAChRβ2 with honey bee nAChRα8. Phenotypic assessment revealed significantly impaired motor functions in climbing and flight assays when comparing flies carrying the α8/β2 chimeric channel to wild type or a β2 knock-out. Despite these motor deficits, both flies expressing the α8/β2 chimeric receptor and β2 knock-out flies showed significantly increased survival after exposure to neonicotinoids thiamethoxam and clothianidin, compared to wild type flies. Combinatorial exposure to different insecticides did not reveal differences. These findings highlight the critical role of nAChR subunit composition in motor control, and demonstrate how subtle structural modifications within a single nAChR subunit can profoundly impact motor function and pesticide response, offering new insights into the molecular mechanisms of neurotoxicity across species.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsReceptors, NicotinicAnimalsBeesDrosophilaSpecies SpecificityThiazolesDrosophila ProteinsInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsReceptors, NicotinicThiazolesApis melliferaCRISPR-Cas9 genome engineeringDrosophilanAChRNeonicotinoidsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID41102314
PMCPMC12533226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.