ArticleScientific reports2025
Differential responses of Cacao pathogens Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Pestalotiopsis sp. to UVB 305 nm and UVC 275 nm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology.Pest management science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable control of microbial pathogens requires alternatives to chemical agents. However, the efficacy of physical methods like Ultraviolet-C (UVC) radiation is often inconsistent due to poorly understood, pathogen-specific resistance mechanisms. To address this, we investigated the differential responses of cacao-infecting fungi (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and the more resistant Pestalotiopsis sp.) to UVB (305 nm) and UVC (275 nm) radiation. We developed an integrated framework using quantitative morphology, hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and machine learning to dissect the physiological underpinnings of UV sensitivity. UVC proved significantly more potent than UVB; for example, a 4-min UVC exposure achieved a similar level of inactivation on a sensitive isolate as a 30-min UVB exposure. After 30 min of UVC, the resistant Pestalotiopsis sp. maintained an 89% survival rate, whereas C. gloeosporioides isolates were almost completely inactivated (< 8% survival). HSI revealed that this resistance correlated with physiological stability, while sensitive isolates exhibited significant biochemical disruption. Machine learning models successfully classified isolates based on their UV-induced phenotypes with over 73% accuracy. This understanding enabled targeted strategies, such as synergistic treatment with sonication, which overcame the high resistance of Pestalotiopsis sp. Our work provides a mechanistic basis for optimizing physical pathogen controls by linking non-invasively measured physiological states to UV resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.