Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102289›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cognitive-inspired xLSTM for multi-agent information retrieval.

Li Liang, Huan Wang, Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li LiangThe School of Law at Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Zigong, China. purls52@163.com.
Huan WangLibrary of Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150040, China. sissonlamb0216@outlook.com.
Kai WangCollege of Sports and Human Sciences, Harbin Sport University, Harbin, 150001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of big data and complex information retrieval tasks, multi-agent systems play a crucial role in handling large-scale, complex queries across various domains. Traditional approaches, such as BERT, RoBERTa, and Transformer models, have been widely used in information retrieval. However, these methods often suffer from computational inefficiencies and limited coordination between agents when dealing with long-term dependencies and collaborative tasks. These limitations lead to suboptimal retrieval accuracy and increased processing time, especially in multi-agent environments. To address these challenges, we propose a cognitive-inspired xLSTM model, specifically designed for multi-agent information retrieval. The model introduces advanced memory mechanisms, shared memory structures, and dynamic gating functions, enabling effective long-term dependency management and enhanced agent collaboration. The xLSTM allows agents to exchange information efficiently, optimizing both retrieval speed and accuracy. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets-HotpotQA, APPS, MBPP, and FEVER-demonstrate that xLSTM significantly outperforms six state-of-the-art methods in terms of training time, inference time, and key performance metrics such as accuracy, recall, and F1 score. The proposed method not only improves retrieval performance but also enhances computational efficiency, making it a valuable solution for real-time, large-scale information retrieval tasks.

Indexed as

Cognitive-inspired modelsDynamic memory managementInformation retrievalMulti-agent systemsxLSTM

Identifiers

PMID41102289
PMCPMC12533026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.