Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Innate spectral preferences and aversive visual learning reveal wavelength-dependent preferences and discrimination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Yoichi Seki, Yasuhiro Toriitsuka, Tamaki Yamada, Ayaka Tanaka, Masahiro Mitsumasu, Takako Morimoto, Junji Yamauchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoichi SekiLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan. yseki@toyaku.ac.jp.
Yasuhiro ToriitsukaLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.
Tamaki YamadaLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.
Ayaka TanakaLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.
Masahiro MitsumasuLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.
Takako MorimotoLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.
Junji YamauchiLaboratory of Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, School of Life Sciences, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192- 0392, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP25870768, JP18K06342, JP21K06273, JP25K09706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatic information is detected by distinctly tuned photoreceptors and used in both innate and learned behaviors. Although the molecular identities and spectral sensitivities of these photoreceptors have been extensively characterized, how they combine to function remains elusive. We conducted innate spectral preference and visual learning assays in Drosophila melanogaster, a well-established model for exploring the neural mechanisms underlying behaviors. First, we assessed spectral preferences based on slow phototactic responses using combinations of monochromatic LED lights ranging from 402 nm to 630 nm. Flies showed a preference for moderately longer wavelengths (green to orange) over shorter wavelengths (violet to blue). Next, we performed an aversive heat conditioning assay to test wavelength discrimination using the same set of light combinations. Flies successfully learned to discriminate between light stimuli within the short to middle wavelengths (violet to green), but failed to discriminate stimuli within the middle to long wavelengths (green to red). Furthermore, these discrimination behaviors were compared to distances in photoreceptor space, suggesting that the photoreceptor space defined by the two opponent channels-short (Rh3/Rh4) vs. long (Rh6), and middle (Rh5) vs. short (Rh3/Rh4) and long (Rh6)-can effectively predict the behavioral results.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionDrosophila melanogasterLearningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalLightPhotic StimulationPhotoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate

Identifiers

PMID41102277
PMCPMC12533087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.