Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102268›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prognostic impact of hand-foot skin reaction in regorafenib-treated adult-type diffuse gliomas: A multicenter Turkish Oncology Group study.

Safa Can Efil, Burak Bilgin, Irem Bilgetekin, Kaan Helvaci, Teoman Sakalar, Erdinc Nayir, Fatma Esra Erdem Palaz, Ali Kaan Guren, Sedat Biter, Taha Koray Sahin and 25 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Safa Can EfilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. scefil@hotmail.com.
Burak BilginDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Irem BilgetekinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kaan HelvaciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Teoman SakalarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
Erdinc NayirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toros University, Mersin, Turkey.
Fatma Esra Erdem PalazDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Ali Kaan GurenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sedat BiterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Taha Koray SahinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ertugrul BayramDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Neyran KertmenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Melih ArslanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Esra AsıkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Orhun AkdoganDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozkan AlanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpasa Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Evren FidanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Ozan YaziciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Elif SahinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli City Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Engin KutDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.
Ceren Mordag CicekDepartment of Medical Oncology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Sema TurkerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nagihan KolkiranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Gamze Gokoz DoguDepartment of Medical Oncology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Mustafa SahbazlarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Aziz BatuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bilgesah KilictasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Mesut YilmazDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Nejat Emre OksuzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet ArtacDepartment of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Sinem AkbasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Efnan AlginDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Yuksel UrunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali Nahit SendurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Bulent YalcinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, and treatment options for recurrent disease are limited. Regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has shown efficacy in glioblastoma at first recurrence, but its role in later recurrences and in other adult-type diffuse gliomas remains unclear. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib and to identify prognostic factors in patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas, including glioblastoma, who were treated at the second or subsequent recurrences. A total of 68 patients from 22 institutions were analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) was 3.84 months, and the median progression-free survival was 2.46 months. The objective response rate was 13%, and the disease control rate was 48%. Adverse events occurred in 80.9% of patients, most commonly fatigue, anemia, and elevated transaminases. Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) of any grade was observed in 36.4% of patients and was associated with significantly improved OS (HR: 0.41; p = 0.005). Regorafenib demonstrated a manageable safety profile and modest activity in this heavily pretreated population. The development of HFSR emerged as a potential prognostic marker for treatment benefit. Taken together, our findings support further exploration of regorafenib in this setting and suggest that HFSR may serve as a practical marker to guide treatment continuation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHand-Foot SyndromePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTurkeyAntineoplastic AgentsPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesregorafenibAdult-type diffuse gliomasGlioblastomaHand–foot skin reactionRegorafenib

Identifiers

PMID41102268
PMCPMC12533162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.