Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102246›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Structural damage detection using voting ensemble of fine-tuned convolutional neural networks and time-frequency images.

Hessam Amanollah, Reza Karami Mohammadi, Amir K Ghorbani-Tanha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hessam AmanollahDepartment of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Reza Karami MohammadiDepartment of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. rkarami@kntu.ac.ir.
Amir K Ghorbani-TanhaSchool of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the recorded response of a structure to dynamic loads is an efficient method for understanding and describing its current status. In the present paper, the ability of different Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithms using time-frequency images and the performance of a voting ensemble of the models have been investigated in classifying various types of structural damage. The time-frequency images fed into CNNs were generated from acceleration responses obtained from undamaged and damaged conditions of experimental and real-world structures. The structural damages considered in the case studies encompassed various types, severities, and locations, highlighting the variation in the damaged conditions. The findings indicated that employment of a soft voting ensemble learning method, with an average prediction accuracy of 98.5%, Yielded appropriate outcomes. Moreover, in the evaluation of different CNN architectures assessed, DenseNet-based models exhibited superior performance in three distinct considered structures, while VGG-based models exhibited the highest performance across all CNNs in one specific case study focused on the location of damages, respectively. Additionally, an examination was carried out to evaluate the impact of factors that could influence the prediction accuracy of the algorithms. The results showed that increasing the duration of each acceleration record led to an improvement in the final accuracy by about 4% in the investigated structure. Furthermore, the usage of Bump mother wavelet gave rise to the highest performance.

Indexed as

Continuous wavelet transformConvolutional neural networksDamage detectionStructural health monitoringTime-frequency image

Identifiers

PMID41102246
PMCPMC12533000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.